Daily verification · methodology v0.3.1

How far off was each weather model?

Over the last 90 days, across 23 U.S. stations, the most accurate raw instantaneous temperature forecast 1 day ahead is ECMWF AIFS Single: mean absolute error 2.44 °F [2.35, 2.53], bias −0.99 °F, on n = 87 scored days.

Scope: raw model output on the native 0.25° grid. The headline variable is the instantaneous 2 m temperature at 00/06/12/18 UTC, scored against the observed 2 m temperature at the same instant (ASOS routine METAR) — the same four instants on both sides, so nothing in the number depends on a model's own diurnal amplitude. Errors are computed in °C and shown in °F (methodology v0.3.1).

Window
the last 90 days
Variable
instantaneous temperature
Init
00Z
Interpolation
nearest
Data through
2026-10-28
Updated
Next update

Leader, lead day 1

2.44°F

[2.35, 2.53] MAE

ECMWF AIFS Single

Persistence baseline

3.58°F

[3.25, 4.00]

the observation lead_day days earlier — the bar every model has to clear at its own lead

Scored days

87

23 stations · 12 systems

in the last 90 days, lead day 1

Systems ranked

11/12

next update

below n = 30: published, greyed, unranked

Mean absolute error with 95 % confidence intervals

Lead day 1 · the last 90 days · 23 stations pooled · 00Z · nearest · instantaneous temperature. Whiskers are moving-block bootstrap intervals; models whose whiskers overlap are not distinguishable at this sample size. Baselines are drawn in grey and never ranked.

MAE by model with 95 % confidence intervals, lead day 1, 90d, 00Z, nearest012345mean absolute error, °FECMWF AIFS SingleECMWF AIFS Single: 2.44 °F2.44ECMWF IFS HRESECMWF IFS HRES: 2.74 °F2.74Aurora (IFS init)Aurora (IFS init): 2.75 °F2.75GraphCast (IFS init)GraphCast (IFS init): 2.81 °F2.81FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)FourCastNet v2 (IFS init): 2.83 °F2.83Pangu-Weather (GFS init)Pangu-Weather (GFS init): 2.9 °F2.9FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)FourCastNet v2 (GFS init): 2.92 °F2.92Pangu-Weather (IFS init)Pangu-Weather (IFS init): 2.92 °F2.92NCEP GFSNCEP GFS: 3.03 °F3.03Aurora (GFS init)Aurora (GFS init): 3.07 °F3.07GraphCast (GFS init)GraphCast (GFS init): 3.1 °F3.1Persistence (baseline)Persistence (baseline): 3.58 °F3.58

Source: CastCheck 0.3.3, methodology v0.3.1 · ECMWF open data, NOAA/NCEP GFS, NOAA/CIRA AIWP, NWS ASOS · data through 2026-10-28 · CC BY 4.0. Hover a bar for its value.

Lead day 1target = init + 1 d

permalink

The last 90 days, all 23 stations pooled, 00Z initialization, nearest interpolation, instantaneous temperature against the observed 2 m temperature at the same instant (ASOS routine METAR). Lower MAE is better; bias is positive when the model is too warm. Every number links to its permanent page.

Skill is 1 − MAE ÷ MAE(persistence) computed on the days both have a value — the small print in that column is that denominator and the size of the intersection, so the number can be checked against the persistence row rather than contradicting it. The persistence row's own n is its whole record, marked all days. Skill, debiased (out-of-sample) repeats the score after removing a bias estimated on the 30 scored days before each day and applied forward, never on the day itself. An interval reads — when the bootstrap could not run: fewer than 28 scored days or fewer than 4 blocks. Hit-rate intervals are Wilson score intervals, not bootstraps.

Lead day 1, the last 90 days, 00Z, nearest, instantaneous temperature.
RankModelMAE °FBias °F±3 °F SkillSkill, debiased (out-of-sample) nvs leader
1ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single2.44[2.35, 2.53]−0.99[−1.12, −0.87]69% +0.32[+0.24, +0.40]vs 3.59 (n=87)+0.53n=72 8722.9 stns · 5 QC★ lowest MAE among ranked models (n >= 30) in this view
2ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres2.74[2.63, 2.85]−0.60[−0.80, −0.40]65% +0.24[+0.15, +0.32]vs 3.59 (n=87)+0.42n=72 8722.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
3Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs2.75[2.65, 2.86]−1.50[−1.66, −1.35]63% +0.22[+0.13, +0.29]vs 3.52 (n=82)+0.48n=82 8222.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
4GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs2.81[2.71, 2.91]−1.61[−1.76, −1.48]62% +0.22[+0.13, +0.32]vs 3.60 (n=86)+0.49n=86 8622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
5FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs2.83[2.77, 2.88]−1.18[−1.32, −1.01]62% +0.21[+0.13, +0.29]vs 3.61 (n=87)+0.37n=87 8722.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
6Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs2.90[2.82, 2.98]−1.06[−1.25, −0.85]62% +0.19[+0.09, +0.27]vs 3.58 (n=56)+0.44n=56 5622.9 stns · 3 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
7FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs2.92[2.84, 3.00]−1.41[−1.60, −1.23]61% +0.18[+0.09, +0.27]vs 3.58 (n=56)+0.36n=56 5622.9 stns · 3 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
8Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs2.92[2.84, 3.00]−1.26[−1.36, −1.15]61% +0.19[+0.10, +0.27]vs 3.59 (n=84)+0.47n=84 8422.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
9NCEP GFSgfs3.03[2.89, 3.18]+0.48[0.27, 0.68]60% +0.16[+0.04, +0.27]vs 3.59 (n=87)+0.38n=72 8722.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
10Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs3.07[2.91, 3.26]−1.94[−2.18, −1.69]58% +0.14[+0.00, +0.26]vs 3.58 (n=56)+0.47n=56 5622.9 stns · 3 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
11GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs3.10[2.95, 3.25]−1.98[−2.19, −1.78]59% +0.13[+0.00, +0.24]vs 3.58 (n=56)+0.45n=56 5622.9 stns · 3 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
—Persistence (baseline)persistence · baseline3.58[3.25, 4.00]+0.20[0.02, 0.42]57% —— 89all days · 5 QC

+ model too warm − model too cold bias interval includes zero ★ lowest MAE among ranked models (n ≥ 30) = not distinguishable from the leader ▼ worse than the leader ▲ better than the leader — all three Holm-corrected within this table, over the family of comparisons against the leader; the uncorrected verdict for every pair is published in the pairwise table of each permanent link and in pairwise_latest.csv.gzn < 30 greyed and unranked CI is a 95 % moving-block bootstrap interval on the group's own days, and reads — when it could not be computed skill reads — when fewer than 10 days are common to the model and the baseline: the ratio of two means over a handful of shared days is not a number worth printing

Lead day 3target = init + 3 d

permalink

Same sampling as lead day 1. Skill is 1 − MAE ÷ MAE(persistence) on the days both have a value.

Lead day 3, the last 90 days, 00Z, nearest, instantaneous temperature.
RankModelMAE °FBias °FSkillnvs leader
1ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single2.64[2.52, 2.75]−0.95[−1.12, −0.80]+0.49[+0.39, +0.58]vs 5.20 (n=85)8522.9 stns · 5 QC★ lowest MAE among ranked models (n >= 30) in this view
2GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs3.05[2.93, 3.17]−1.66[−1.83, −1.50]+0.41[+0.30, +0.52]vs 5.16 (n=86)8622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
3FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs3.07[3.00, 3.14]−1.19[−1.37, −1.04]+0.40[+0.29, +0.50]vs 5.16 (n=87)8722.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
4ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres3.09[2.98, 3.19]−0.55[−0.86, −0.22]+0.41[+0.30, +0.50]vs 5.20 (n=85)8522.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
5Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs3.10[2.95, 3.26]−1.74[−1.95, −1.53]+0.38[+0.25, +0.49]vs 4.98 (n=82)8222.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
6FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs3.19[3.09, 3.31]−1.40[−1.60, −1.20]+0.36[+0.24, +0.48]vs 4.99 (n=54)5423 stns · 2 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
7Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs3.28[3.19, 3.39]−1.58[−1.74, −1.42]+0.35[+0.24, +0.45]vs 5.07 (n=84)8422.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
8NCEP GFSgfs3.35[3.23, 3.50]+0.55[0.26, 0.83]+0.35[+0.22, +0.48]vs 5.20 (n=85)8522.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
9Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs3.37[3.25, 3.50]−1.50[−1.69, −1.32]+0.32[+0.20, +0.44]vs 4.99 (n=54)5423 stns · 2 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
10GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs3.50[3.26, 3.77]−2.24[−2.56, −1.91]+0.30[+0.13, +0.45]vs 4.99 (n=54)5423 stns · 2 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
11Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs3.74[3.49, 3.97]−2.60[−2.97, −2.17]+0.25[+0.07, +0.41]vs 4.99 (n=54)5423 stns · 2 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
—Persistence (baseline)persistence · baseline5.14[4.37, 6.11]+0.60[0.12, 1.21]—89all days · 5 QC

Lead day 5target = init + 5 d

permalink

Same sampling as lead day 1. Skill is 1 − MAE ÷ MAE(persistence) on the days both have a value.

Lead day 5, the last 90 days, 00Z, nearest, instantaneous temperature.
RankModelMAE °FBias °FSkillnvs leader
1ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single3.06[2.90, 3.22]−0.81[−1.04, −0.58]+0.47[+0.37, +0.55]vs 5.78 (n=83)8322.9 stns · 5 QC★ lowest MAE among ranked models (n >= 30) in this view
2Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs3.49[3.35, 3.62]−1.79[−2.08, −1.49]+0.36[+0.22, +0.48]vs 5.44 (n=81)8122.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
3GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs3.50[3.33, 3.67]−1.68[−1.92, −1.39]+0.38[+0.27, +0.49]vs 5.65 (n=86)8622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
4FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs3.54[3.33, 3.80]−1.17[−1.42, −0.94]+0.38[+0.27, +0.46]vs 5.67 (n=87)8722.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
5ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres3.59[3.37, 3.86]−0.50[−0.94, −0.08]+0.38[+0.27, +0.46]vs 5.78 (n=83)8322.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
6FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs3.70[3.43, 4.01]−1.45[−1.81, −1.10]+0.35[+0.21, +0.46]vs 5.64 (n=56)5622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
7Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs3.87[3.65, 4.05]−1.88[−2.12, −1.65]+0.30[+0.19, +0.41]vs 5.55 (n=84)8422.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
8GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs3.93[3.70, 4.15]−2.17[−2.47, −1.86]+0.30[+0.12, +0.46]vs 5.64 (n=56)5622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
9Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs3.96[3.78, 4.14]−1.69[−1.90, −1.51]+0.30[+0.14, +0.44]vs 5.64 (n=56)5622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
10NCEP GFSgfs3.99[3.80, 4.19]+0.37[0.10, 0.65]+0.31[+0.18, +0.42]vs 5.78 (n=83)8322.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
11Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs4.43[4.14, 4.67]−3.08[−3.59, −2.57]+0.21[+0.01, +0.39]vs 5.64 (n=56)5622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
—Persistence (baseline)persistence · baseline5.65[4.73, 6.80]+1.03[0.30, 1.93]—89all days · 5 QC

Lead day 7target = init + 7 d

permalink

Same sampling as lead day 1. Skill is 1 − MAE ÷ MAE(persistence) on the days both have a value.

Lead day 7, the last 90 days, 00Z, nearest, instantaneous temperature.
RankModelMAE °FBias °FSkillnvs leader
1ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single3.83[3.41, 4.27]−1.17[−1.50, −0.82]+0.36[+0.28, +0.43]vs 6.01 (n=81)8122.9 stns · 5 QC★ lowest MAE among ranked models (n >= 30) in this view
2Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs4.05[3.87, 4.27]−1.47[−2.02, −0.80]+0.28[+0.16, +0.39]vs 5.64 (n=81)8122.9 stns · 5 QC= not distinguishable from the leader after the Holm correction within this table
3FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs4.09[3.76, 4.49]−1.40[−1.79, −1.01]+0.31[+0.22, +0.39]vs 5.88 (n=87)8722.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
4FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs4.18[3.91, 4.50]−1.46[−1.84, −1.07]+0.29[+0.18, +0.39]vs 5.89 (n=55)5522.9 stns · 4 QC= not distinguishable from the leader after the Holm correction within this table
5GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs4.25[3.83, 4.80]−1.80[−2.26, −1.39]+0.27[+0.18, +0.37]vs 5.86 (n=86)8622.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
6ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres4.37[3.98, 4.84]−0.32[−1.00, 0.31]+0.27[+0.17, +0.36]vs 6.01 (n=81)8122.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
7GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs4.58[4.19, 5.02]−2.14[−2.63, −1.64]+0.22[+0.09, +0.34]vs 5.89 (n=55)5522.9 stns · 4 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
8Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs4.62[4.30, 4.98]−2.18[−2.48, −1.92]+0.20[+0.09, +0.30]vs 5.76 (n=84)8422.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
9Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs4.66[4.38, 4.93]−1.79[−2.10, −1.45]+0.21[+0.05, +0.35]vs 5.89 (n=55)5522.9 stns · 4 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
10NCEP GFSgfs4.85[4.45, 5.32]+0.39[−0.11, 0.83]+0.19[+0.06, +0.31]vs 6.01 (n=81)8122.9 stns · 5 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
11Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs5.10[4.89, 5.29]−3.40[−4.03, −2.70]+0.13[−0.05, +0.29]vs 5.89 (n=55)5522.9 stns · 4 QC▼ worse than the leader; distinguishable after the Holm correction within this table
—Persistence (baseline)persistence · baseline5.86[4.89, 7.02]+1.40[0.49, 2.55]—89all days · 5 QC

The same four samples as a daily maximum and minimum

Lead day 1, the last 90 days, 00Z, nearest. Here the forecast's max/min of the four samples is scored against the observation's max/min of the same four instants. Like for like: whatever the four-sample definition misses, it misses on both sides. The comparison against the true NWS daily extremes is a different question and lives on the station and permanent-link pages.

Sampled daily maximumtmax_s

RankModelMAE °FBias °FSkillnvs leader
1ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single2.10[2.00, 2.21]−0.36[−0.50, −0.22]+0.42vs 3.60 (n=87)87★
2Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs2.59[2.46, 2.74]−0.49[−0.66, −0.29]+0.28vs 3.62 (n=84)84▼
3ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres2.62[2.50, 2.78]−0.63[−0.95, −0.29]+0.27vs 3.60 (n=87)87▼
4FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs2.69[2.56, 2.82]−1.48[−1.57, −1.37]+0.26vs 3.63 (n=87)87▼
5Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs2.71[2.61, 2.81]−0.65[−0.81, −0.50]+0.24vs 3.57 (n=56)56▼
6GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs2.88[2.66, 3.05]−1.89[−2.12, −1.67]+0.20vs 3.61 (n=86)86▼
7FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs2.91[2.81, 3.00]−1.74[−1.90, −1.57]+0.19vs 3.57 (n=56)56▼
8Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs2.95[2.77, 3.12]−2.02[−2.23, −1.81]+0.17vs 3.56 (n=82)82▼
9NCEP GFSgfs2.97[2.68, 3.27]+0.59[0.07, 1.10]+0.17vs 3.60 (n=87)87▼
10GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs3.57[3.34, 3.83]−2.92[−3.19, −2.66]−0.00vs 3.57 (n=56)56▼
11Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs3.71[3.41, 4.04]−3.06[−3.36, −2.74]−0.04vs 3.57 (n=56)56▼
—Persistence (baseline)persistence3.60[3.16, 4.08]+0.20[−0.01, 0.41]—89all days

Sampled daily minimumtmin_s

RankModelMAE °FBias °FSkillnvs leader
1Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs2.17[2.04, 2.29]−0.68[−0.90, −0.48]+0.23vs 2.82 (n=82)82★
2GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs2.17[2.04, 2.30]−0.81[−0.96, −0.66]+0.26vs 2.92 (n=86)86=
3Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs2.27[2.12, 2.40]−0.55[−0.82, −0.29]+0.21vs 2.88 (n=56)56▼
4GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs2.34[2.19, 2.48]−0.65[−0.92, −0.41]+0.19vs 2.88 (n=56)56▼
5ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres2.35[2.16, 2.55]−0.30[−0.45, −0.16]+0.20vs 2.92 (n=87)87▼
6Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs2.39[2.25, 2.52]−0.49[−0.74, −0.23]+0.17vs 2.88 (n=56)56▼
7ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single2.40[2.25, 2.57]−1.39[−1.55, −1.23]+0.18vs 2.92 (n=87)87▼
8Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs2.42[2.33, 2.51]−0.91[−1.06, −0.77]+0.17vs 2.90 (n=84)84▼
9FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs2.65[2.56, 2.76]−1.10[−1.34, −0.82]+0.09vs 2.92 (n=87)87▼
10FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs2.67[2.54, 2.80]−1.25[−1.58, −0.96]+0.07vs 2.88 (n=56)56▼
11NCEP GFSgfs2.84[2.63, 3.09]+0.88[0.46, 1.36]+0.03vs 2.92 (n=87)87▼
—Persistence (baseline)persistence2.90[2.53, 3.37]+0.20[−0.02, 0.46]—89all days

Every model × every lead day

MAE in °F with the bias and n underneath, the last 90 days, 00Z, nearest, instantaneous temperature. The sparkline is the same model's MAE across lead days 1–9 on a shared vertical scale.

Modeld0d1d2d3d4d5d6d7d8d9 lead 1–9
ECMWF AIFS Singleaifs_single2.33−1.00 · n=882.44−0.99 · n=872.53−1.00 · n=862.64−0.95 · n=852.84−0.92 · n=843.06−0.81 · n=833.40−0.86 · n=823.83−1.17 · n=814.24−1.15 · n=804.56−0.51 · n=79ECMWF AIFS Single MAE by lead day 1 to 9
Aurora (GFS init)aurora_gfs2.73−1.43 · n=563.07−1.94 · n=563.41−2.30 · n=553.74−2.60 · n=544.04−2.88 · n=554.43−3.08 · n=564.83−3.25 · n=555.10−3.40 · n=555.49−3.64 · n=555.67−3.82 · n=55Aurora (GFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
Aurora (IFS init)aurora_ifs2.52−1.34 · n=822.75−1.50 · n=822.92−1.66 · n=823.10−1.74 · n=823.30−1.77 · n=813.49−1.79 · n=813.80−1.59 · n=814.05−1.47 · n=814.29−1.43 · n=814.41−1.17 · n=81Aurora (IFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)fourcastnet_gfs2.89−1.49 · n=562.92−1.41 · n=563.10−1.42 · n=553.19−1.40 · n=543.35−1.38 · n=553.70−1.45 · n=563.93−1.43 · n=554.18−1.46 · n=554.41−1.54 · n=554.73−1.35 · n=55FourCastNet v2 (GFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)fourcastnet_ifs2.74−1.41 · n=872.83−1.18 · n=872.94−1.19 · n=873.07−1.19 · n=873.26−1.18 · n=873.54−1.17 · n=873.77−1.24 · n=874.09−1.40 · n=874.37−1.50 · n=874.62−1.33 · n=87FourCastNet v2 (IFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
NCEP GFSgfs2.82+0.48 · n=883.03+0.48 · n=873.13+0.44 · n=863.35+0.55 · n=853.59+0.48 · n=843.99+0.37 · n=834.41+0.46 · n=824.85+0.39 · n=815.45+0.13 · n=805.83−0.49 · n=79NCEP GFS MAE by lead day 1 to 9
GraphCast (GFS init)graphcast_gfs2.88−1.50 · n=563.10−1.98 · n=563.32−2.13 · n=553.50−2.24 · n=543.66−2.31 · n=553.93−2.17 · n=564.19−2.14 · n=554.58−2.14 · n=555.10−2.29 · n=555.33−2.43 · n=55GraphCast (GFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
GraphCast (IFS init)graphcast_ifs2.57−1.34 · n=862.81−1.61 · n=862.95−1.69 · n=863.05−1.66 · n=863.26−1.64 · n=863.50−1.68 · n=863.82−1.60 · n=864.25−1.80 · n=864.71−1.91 · n=864.97−1.86 · n=86GraphCast (IFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
ECMWF IFS HRESifs_hres2.56−0.59 · n=882.74−0.60 · n=872.90−0.56 · n=863.09−0.55 · n=853.26−0.58 · n=843.59−0.50 · n=833.98−0.33 · n=824.37−0.32 · n=814.64−0.27 · n=805.01−0.05 · n=79ECMWF IFS HRES MAE by lead day 1 to 9
Pangu-Weather (GFS init)pangu_gfs2.69−0.70 · n=562.90−1.06 · n=563.15−1.32 · n=553.37−1.50 · n=543.59−1.60 · n=553.96−1.69 · n=564.36−1.69 · n=554.66−1.79 · n=555.38−2.01 · n=555.48−1.66 · n=55Pangu-Weather (GFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
Pangu-Weather (IFS init)pangu_ifs2.64−0.87 · n=842.92−1.26 · n=843.10−1.44 · n=843.28−1.58 · n=843.57−1.67 · n=843.87−1.88 · n=844.23−1.97 · n=844.62−2.18 · n=845.05−2.26 · n=845.16−1.72 · n=84Pangu-Weather (IFS init) MAE by lead day 1 to 9
Persistence (baseline)persistence—3.58+0.20 · n=894.62+0.39 · n=895.14+0.60 · n=895.36+0.84 · n=895.65+1.03 · n=895.71+1.21 · n=895.86+1.40 · n=895.95+1.56 · n=896.07+1.79 · n=89Persistence (baseline) MAE by lead day 1 to 9

Where the errors are

Both maps show a fixed quantity per station. Neither shows which model wins where: on samples this short the per-station winner is mostly noise, and a map of winners would invite a comparison the data cannot carry.

ECMWF IFS HRES bias

Mean bias of the fixed reference model ECMWF IFS HRES (lead day 1, instantaneous temperature, 90d window, 00Z, nearest). One model everywhere, so the colours compare stations, not models. Dot area grows with the number of scored days; fill is the mean bias (warm = model too warm, cool = too cold, grey = interval includes zero). The frame is a latitude/longitude graticule on an Albers projection.

Source: CastCheck · station coordinates NWS/NOAA · Albers conic projection · stations.csv. Hover a dot for its numbers.

model too cold interval includes zero model too warm dot area ∝ scored days

ECMWF IFS HRES bias as a table
StationModelMAE °FBias °Fn
KATL Atlanta HartsfieldECMWF IFS HRES2.50−0.8087
KAUS Austin BergstromECMWF IFS HRES2.69+0.9887
KBOS Boston LoganECMWF IFS HRES2.50−0.8183
KDCA Washington ReaganECMWF IFS HRES2.70−1.1787
KDEN Denver IntlECMWF IFS HRES3.17+1.2887
KDFW Dallas-Fort WorthECMWF IFS HRES2.19+0.9687
KEWR Newark LibertyECMWF IFS HRES2.88−2.2287
KIAH Houston BushECMWF IFS HRES2.31−0.6987
KLAS Las Vegas Harry ReidECMWF IFS HRES4.18−3.5987
KLAX Los Angeles IntlECMWF IFS HRES2.67−2.3387
KMIA Miami IntlECMWF IFS HRES2.64−1.8587
KMSP Minneapolis-St PaulECMWF IFS HRES2.33−0.2287
KMSY New Orleans IntlECMWF IFS HRES2.18+0.1587
KNYC New York Central ParkECMWF IFS HRES2.23−0.2886
KOKC Oklahoma CityECMWF IFS HRES4.06+2.7787
KORD Chicago O'HareECMWF IFS HRES2.43−1.4987
KPHL Philadelphia IntlECMWF IFS HRES3.12−2.3787
KPHX Phoenix Sky HarborECMWF IFS HRES3.15−1.0387
KSAN San Diego LindberghECMWF IFS HRES3.81−3.0687
KSAT San Antonio IntlECMWF IFS HRES2.12+1.2287
KSEA Seattle-TacomaECMWF IFS HRES2.18−0.1287
KSFO San Francisco IntlECMWF IFS HRES2.89+0.4887
KTTN Trenton MercerECMWF IFS HRES2.02+0.3986

All-model mean bias

Mean bias averaged over every scored model at each station (lead day 1, instantaneous temperature, 90d window, 00Z, nearest). A station that is cold for all of them is a station property — elevation, coastline, a grid cell that is partly sea — not a model ranking. Dot area grows with the number of scored days; fill is the mean bias (warm = model too warm, cool = too cold). The frame is a latitude/longitude graticule on an Albers projection.

Source: CastCheck · station coordinates NWS/NOAA · Albers conic projection · stations.csv. Hover a dot for its numbers.

model too cold interval includes zero model too warm dot area ∝ scored days

All-model mean bias as a table
StationModelsMAE °FBias °Fn
KATL Atlanta Hartsfield11 models2.95−1.3587
KAUS Austin Bergstrom11 models2.80+0.0687
KBOS Boston Logan11 models2.57−1.3883
KDCA Washington Reagan11 models2.56−1.4387
KDEN Denver Intl11 models3.28−0.9787
KDFW Dallas-Fort Worth11 models2.72−1.5287
KEWR Newark Liberty11 models2.87−2.0787
KIAH Houston Bush11 models2.46−0.7087
KLAS Las Vegas Harry Reid11 models5.33−5.1187
KLAX Los Angeles Intl11 models2.73−1.7787
KMIA Miami Intl11 models2.24−0.6287
KMSP Minneapolis-St Paul11 models2.90−1.6587
KMSY New Orleans Intl11 models2.08−0.4387
KNYC New York Central Park11 models2.26−0.0186
KOKC Oklahoma City11 models3.45−0.0787
KORD Chicago O'Hare11 models2.34−1.3587
KPHL Philadelphia Intl11 models2.76−1.9287
KPHX Phoenix Sky Harbor11 models4.30−2.8587
KSAN San Diego Lindbergh11 models3.36−2.6587
KSAT San Antonio Intl11 models2.05−0.3187
KSEA Seattle-Tacoma11 models2.50−0.2887
KSFO San Francisco Intl11 models3.14+0.2887
KTTN Trenton Mercer11 models2.20+0.8686

Data availability

Each model is scored only over its own available period (2026-01-01 → 2026-10-27); the windows above are therefore not identical across models. Pairwise comparisons on the permanent-link pages use common days only.

ModelPeriodScored daysCoverage
ECMWF AIFS Single2026-08-02 → 2026-10-2787
2026-01-012026-10-27
Aurora (GFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27216
2026-01-012026-10-27
Aurora (IFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27232
2026-01-012026-10-27
FourCastNet v2 (GFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27216
2026-01-012026-10-27
FourCastNet v2 (IFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27237
2026-01-012026-10-27
NCEP GFS2026-08-02 → 2026-10-2787
2026-01-012026-10-27
GraphCast (GFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27216
2026-01-012026-10-27
GraphCast (IFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27256
2026-01-012026-10-27
ECMWF IFS HRES2026-08-02 → 2026-10-2787
2026-01-012026-10-27
Pangu-Weather (GFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27216
2026-01-012026-10-27
Pangu-Weather (IFS init)2026-01-02 → 2026-10-27234
2026-01-012026-10-27
Persistence (baseline)2026-01-01 → 2026-10-27300
2026-01-012026-10-27

Stations23

full station table
  • KNYC — New York Central Park
  • KEWR — Newark Liberty
  • KPHL — Philadelphia Intl
  • KTTN — Trenton Mercer
  • KBOS — Boston Logan
  • KDCA — Washington Reagan
  • KATL — Atlanta Hartsfield
  • KMIA — Miami Intl
  • KORD — Chicago O'Hare
  • KMSP — Minneapolis-St Paul
  • KDFW — Dallas-Fort Worth
  • KIAH — Houston Bush
  • KAUS — Austin Bergstrom
  • KSAT — San Antonio Intl
  • KMSY — New Orleans Intl
  • KOKC — Oklahoma City
  • KDEN — Denver Intl
  • KPHX — Phoenix Sky Harbor
  • KLAS — Las Vegas Harry Reid
  • KLAX — Los Angeles Intl
  • KSAN — San Diego Lindbergh
  • KSFO — San Francisco Intl
  • KSEA — Seattle-Tacoma